You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Optogenetics, Ethical Issues Affecting DBS Research, Neuromodulatory Approaches for Depression, Adaptive Neurostimulation, and Emerging DBS Technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2021.644593 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinata Vedam-Mai, Karl Deisseroth, James Giordano, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Winston Chiong, Nanthia Suthana, Jean-Philippe Langevin, Jay Gill, Wayne Goodman, Nicole R. Provenza, Casey H. Halpern, Rajat S. Shivacharan, Tricia N. Cunningham, Sameer A. Sheth, Nader Pouratian, Katherine W. Scangos, Helen S. Mayberg, Andreas Horn, Kara A. Johnson, Christopher R. Butson, Ro’ee Gilron, Coralie de Hemptinne, Robert Wilt, Maria Yaroshinsky, Simon Little, Philip Starr, Greg Worrell, Prasad Shirvalkar, Edward Chang, Jens Volkmann, Muthuraman Muthuraman, Sergiu Groppa, Andrea A. Kühn, Luming Li, Matthew Johnson, Kevin J. Otto, Robert Raike, Steve Goetz, Chengyuan Wu, Peter Silburn, Binith Cheeran, Yagna J. Pathak, Mahsa Malekmohammadi, Aysegul Gunduz, Joshua K. Wong, Stephanie Cernera, Wei Hu, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Wissam Deeb, Addie Patterson, Kelly D. Foote, Michael S. Okun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 38% |
| Germany | 6 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 68% |
| Scientists | 22 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 22 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#229,662
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#100
of 7,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,876
of 454,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.