You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors Associated With Access to and Timing of Coronavirus Testing Among US Adults After Onset of Febrile Illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark J. Pletcher, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Noah D. Peyser, Madelaine Faulkner Modrow, Feng Lin, Jeffrey Martin, Thomas Carton, Alexis L. Beatty, Eric Vittinghoff, Gregory M. Marcus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2021.
All research outputs
#185,112
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#1,323
of 7,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,642
of 440,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#70
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.