↓ Skip to main content

Mass cytometry reveals a conserved immune trajectory of recovery in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mass cytometry reveals a conserved immune trajectory of recovery in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Published in
Immunity, June 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cassandra E. Burnett, Trine Line Hauge Okholm, Iliana Tenvooren, Diana M. Marquez, Stanley Tamaki, Priscila Munoz Sandoval, Andrew Willmore, The UCSF COMET Consortium, Ravi Patel, Yumiko Abe-Jones, Saurabh Asthana, Alexander Beagle, Sharvari Bhide, Cathy Cai, Maria Calvo, Sidney A. Carrillo, Suzanna Chak, Zachary Collins, Spyros Darmanis, Gabriela K. Fragiadakis, Rajani Ghale, Jeremy Giberson, Pat Glenn, Ana Gonzalez, Kamir Hiam-Galvez, Alejandra Jauregui, Serena Ke, Tasha Lea, Deanna Lee, Raphael Lota, Leonard Lupin-Jimenez, Viet Nguyen, Nishita Nigam, Logan Pierce, Priya Prasad, Arjun Rao, Sadeed Rashid, Nicklaus Rodriguez, Bushra Samad, Cole Shaw, Austin Sigman, Pratik Sinha, Kevin Tang, Luz Torres Altamirano, Erden Tumurbaatar, Vaibhav Upadhyay, Alyssa Ward, Kristine Wong, Chun Jimmie Ye, Kimberly Yee, Mingyue Zhou, Carolyn M. Hendrickson, Kirsten N. Kangelaris, Charles R. Langelier, Matthew F. Krummel, Prescott G. Woodruff, Carolyn S. Calfee, David J. Erle, K. Mark Ansel, Matthew H. Spitzer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,896,053
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Immunity
#1,421
of 4,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,233
of 450,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity
#31
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.