↓ Skip to main content

Cytokines Elevated in HIV Elite Controllers Reduce HIV Replication In Vitro and Modulate HIV Restriction Factor Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Virology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytokines Elevated in HIV Elite Controllers Reduce HIV Replication In Vitro and Modulate HIV Restriction Factor Expression
Published in
Journal of Virology, February 2017
DOI 10.1128/jvi.02051-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan S. Jacobs, Sheila M. Keating, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, Stuart L. Gibb, John W. Heitman, Heather C. Inglis, Jeffrey N. Martin, Jinbing Zhang, Zhanna Kaidarova, Xutao Deng, Shiquan Wu, Kathryn Anastos, Howard Crystal, Maria C. Villacres, Mary Young, Ruth M. Greenblatt, Alan L. Landay, Stephen J. Gange, Steven G. Deeks, Elizabeth T. Golub, Satish K. Pillai, Philip J. Norris

Abstract

A subset of HIV infected individuals termed elite controllers (ECs) maintain CD4+ T cell counts and control viral replication in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Systemic cytokine responses may differentiate ECs from subjects with uncontrolled viral replication or those who require ART to suppress viral replication. We measured 87 cytokines in four groups of women: 73 EC, 42 with pharmacologically suppressed viremia (ART), 42 with uncontrolled viral replication (noncontrollers, NC), and 48 HIV uninfected (NEG) subjects. Four cytokines were elevated in ECs but not NCs or ART subjects: CCL14, CCL21, CCL27, and XCL1. In addition, median SDF-1 levels were 43% higher in ECs than NCs. The combination of the five cytokines suppressed R5 and X4 virus replication in resting CD4+ T cells, and individually SDF-1β, CCL14 and CCL27 suppressed R5 virus replication, while SDF-1β, CCL21, and CCL14 suppressed X4 virus replication. Functional studies revealed that the combination of the five cytokines up-regulated CD69 and CCR5 and down-regulated CXCR4 and CCR7 on CD4+ T cells. The CD69 and CXCR4 effects were driven by SDF-1, while CCL21 down-regulated CCR7. The combination of the EC-associated cytokines induced expression of the anti-HIV host restriction factors IFITM1 and IFITM2 and suppressed expression of RNase L and SAMHD1. These results identify a set of cytokines that are elevated in ECs and define its effects on cellular activation, HIV co-receptor expression, and innate restriction factor expression. This cytokine pattern may be a signature characteristic of HIV-1 elite control, potentially important for HIV therapeutic and curative strategies. Approximately 1% of people infected with HIV control virus replication without taking antiviral medications. These subjects, termed elite controllers (ECs), are known to have stronger immune responses targeting HIV than the typical HIV-infected subject, but the exact mechanisms of how their immune responses control infection are not known. In this study we identified five soluble immune signaling molecules (cytokines) in the blood that were higher in ECs than in subjects with typical chronic HIV infection. We demonstrated that these cytokines can activate CD4+ T cells, the target cells for HIV infection. Furthermore, these five EC-associated cytokines could change expression of intrinsic resistance factors, or molecules inside the target cell that fight HIV infection. This study is significant in that it identified cytokines elevated in subjects with a "good" immune response against HIV and defined potential mechanisms as to how these cytokines could induce resistance to the virus in target cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 33 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,930,354
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#9,613
of 25,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,860
of 324,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#71
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.