↓ Skip to main content

Breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers: insight from mouse models

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers: insight from mouse models
Published in
Annals of Oncology, November 2013
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdt305
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.H. Barcellos-Hoff, D.L. Kleinberg

Abstract

Since its identification 20 years ago, the biological basis for the high breast cancer risk in women who have germline BRCA1 mutations has been an area of intense study for three reasons. First, BRCA1 was the first gene shown to associate with breast cancer risk, and therefore serves as model for understanding genetic susceptibility. Second, the type of breast cancer that occurs in these women has specific features that have engendered new hypotheses about the cancer biology. Third, it is hoped that understanding the origins of this disease may provide the means to prevent disease. Resolving this question has proven extremely challenging because the biology controlled by BRCA1 is complex. Our working model is that the high frequency of basal-like breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers is the result of a self-perpetuating triad of cellular phenotypes consisting of: (i) intrinsic defects in DNA repair and centrosome regulation that lead to genomic instability and increases spontaneous transformation; (ii) aberrant lineage commitment; and (iii) increased proliferation due to in large part to increased IGF-1 activity. We propose that the last is key and is a potential entree for preventing breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Ecuador 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#6,592
of 7,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,155
of 226,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#100
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.