↓ Skip to main content

The functional role of beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
470 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The functional role of beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/s1353-8020(13)70013-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Little, Peter Brown

Abstract

Modulations of beta oscillations (13-30 Hz) during normal motor control suggest that they may act to promote current motor set at the expense of new movements. These oscillations are greatly enhanced in Parkinson's disease (PD) and there is strong correlative evidence linking beta activity at rest and beta changes in response to treatment with bradykinesia and rigidity. Some evidence that this link may be mechanistically important or causal comes from studies in which either cortical or subcortical sites have been stimulated in the beta frequency range causing modest but significant slowing of movements. However, recent trials in which high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) has only been delivered during periods of elevated beta activity have demonstrated major clinical effects that even exceed those of standard continuous high frequency DBS. These studies suggest that beta activity may be both causally and quantitatively important in the motor impairment of PD, and demonstrate how improvements in the understanding of the pathophysiology of PD can lead to enhanced therapeutic interventions in this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 454 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 20%
Researcher 85 18%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 4%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 91 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 115 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 15%
Engineering 44 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 7%
Psychology 24 5%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 133 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,373,276
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#992
of 3,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,113
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.