You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of serum, EDTA plasma and P100 plasma for luminex-based biomarker multiplex assays in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the SPIROMICS study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-12-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wanda K O’Neal, Wayne Anderson, Patricia V Basta, Elizabeth E Carretta, Claire M Doerschuk, R Graham Barr, Eugene R Bleecker, Stephanie A Christenson, Jeffrey L Curtis, Meilan K Han, Nadia N Hansel, Richard E Kanner, Eric C Kleerup, Fernando J Martinez, Bruce E Miller, Stephen P Peters, Stephen I Rennard, Mary Beth Scholand, Ruth Tal-Singer, Prescott G Woodruff, David J Couper, Sonia M Davis |
| Abstract |
As a part of the longitudinal Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) study, Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD study (SPIROMICS), blood samples are being collected from 3200 subjects with the goal of identifying blood biomarkers for sub-phenotyping patients and predicting disease progression. To determine the most reliable sample type for measuring specific blood analytes in the cohort, a pilot study was performed from a subset of 24 subjects comparing serum, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma, and EDTA plasma with proteinase inhibitors (P100). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Professor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,934,754
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,086
of 3,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,938
of 304,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#37
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.