↓ Skip to main content

Risk communication and decision tools for children's health protection

Overview of attention for article published in Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk communication and decision tools for children's health protection
Published in
Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/bdrc.21029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrice Sutton, Tracey J. Woodruff

Abstract

Scientific discovery linking the environment to beneficial and adverse health children's health outcomes is rapidly expanding, leading scientists and health professionals to call for timely action to prevent harm and secure benefits. A robust method to synthesize what is known about the environmental drivers of health is a foundational step to making the science actionable by individuals and decision-makers. To meet this need, a methodology called the Navigation Guide was crafted by a collaboration of 22 clinical and environmental health scientists. The Navigation Guide proceeds from methods of research synthesis used in clinical settings but accounts for differences between environmental and clinical health sciences related to the evidence-base and decision-context. The methodology can be used to develop evidence profiles that provide simple, transparent summaries, such as practice guidelines or other evidence-based recommendations for prevention. Establishing proof-of-concept of the method is underway. Development of the Navigation Guide is extremely timely as it coincides with growing recognition of the need for updated methods in risk assessment. The costs in 2008 to the US healthcare system for treatment of childhood illnesses linked to toxic environmental exposures is conservatively estimated to be over $76 billion, and it is anticipated that US healthcare policy decisions will increasingly rely on systematic reviews of the evidence. The Navigation Guide is poised to provide a methodological bridge to link healthcare decision-making to efforts to reduce toxic environmental exposures. The institutionalization of the Navigation Guide would provide a concrete mechanism for linking science to action to protect children's health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Bangladesh 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
#180
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,626
of 207,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.