You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.113.007149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey J. Goldberger, Anirban Basu, Robin Boineau, Alfred E. Buxton, Michael E. Cain, John M. Canty, Peng-Sheng Chen, Sumeet S. Chugh, Otto Costantini, Derek V. Exner, Alan H. Kadish, Byron Lee, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Arthur J. Moss, Robert J. Myerburg, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Rod Passman, William G. Stevenson, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Wojciech Zareba, Douglas P. Zipes, Laurie Zoloth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 46% |
| Engineering | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,985,886
of 23,760,369 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#7,155
of 20,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,149
of 311,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#65
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,760,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.