↓ Skip to main content

Distinct chromatin functional states correlate with HIV latency reactivation in infected primary CD4+ T cells

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct chromatin functional states correlate with HIV latency reactivation in infected primary CD4+ T cells
Published in
eLife, May 2018
DOI 10.7554/elife.34655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Battivelli, Matthew S Dahabieh, Mohamed Abdel-Mohsen, J Peter Svensson, Israel Tojal Da Silva, Lillian B Cohn, Andrea Gramatica, Steven Deeks, Warner C Greene, Satish K Pillai, Eric Verdin

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is currently incurable, due to the persistence of latently infected cells. The 'shock and kill' approach to a cure proposes to eliminate this reservoir via transcriptional activation of latent proviruses, enabling direct or indirect killing of infected cells. Currently available latency-reversing agents (LRAs) have however proven ineffective. To understand why, we used a novel HIV reporter strain in primary CD4+ T cells and determined which latently infected cells are reactivatable by current candidate LRAs. Remarkably, none of these agents reactivated more than 5% of cells carrying a latent provirus. Sequencing analysis of reactivatable vs.non-reactivatable populations revealed that the integration sites were distinguishable in terms of chromatin functional states. Our findings challenge the feasibility of 'shock and kill', and suggest the need to explore other strategies to control the latent HIV reservoir.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#542,960
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#1,667
of 15,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,459
of 331,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#41
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.