You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Future Research Directions in Asthma. An NHLBI Working Group Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1164/rccm.201505-0963ws |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce D. Levy, Patricia J. Noel, Michelle M. Freemer, Michelle M. Cloutier, Steve N. Georas, Nizar N. Jarjour, Carole Ober, Prescott G. Woodruff, Kathleen C. Barnes, Bruce G. Bender, Carlos A. Camargo, Geoff L. Chupp, Loren C. Denlinger, John V. Fahy, Anne M. Fitzpatrick, Anne Fuhlbrigge, Ben M. Gaston, Tina V. Hartert, Jay K. Kolls, Susan V. Lynch, Wendy C. Moore, Wayne J. Morgan, Kari C. Nadeau, Dennis R. Ownby, Julian Solway, Stanley J. Szefler, Sally E. Wenzel, Rosalind J. Wright, Robert A. Smith, Serpil C. Erzurum |
| Abstract |
Asthma is a common chronic disease without cure. Our understanding of asthma onset, pathobiology, classification and management has evolved substantially over the past decade; however, significant asthma-related morbidity and excess healthcare utilization and cost persist. To address this important clinical condition, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened a group of extramural investigators for an Asthma Research Strategic Planning workshop on September 18-19, 2014 to accelerate discoveries and their translation to patients. The workshop focused on (1) in utero and early life origins of asthma, (2) the use of phenotypes and endotypes to classify disease, (3) defining disease modification, (4) disease management, and (5) implementation research. This report summarizes the workshop, producing recommendations to guide future research in asthma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Guinea | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 26% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#443,716
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#313
of 12,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,186
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#5
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.