↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of an Intensive, Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Training Workshop in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Global Oncology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of an Intensive, Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Training Workshop in Tanzania
Published in
Journal of Global Oncology, October 2018
DOI 10.1200/jgo.18.00134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dianna L. Ng, Edda Vuhahula, Li Zhang, Emily G. Waterhouse, Kristie L. White, Beatrice Paul Mushi, Msiba Selekwa Nyeriga, Godfrey Sama Philipo, Elia J. Mmbaga, Sujay Sheth, Katherine Van Loon, Amie Y. Lee, Ronald Balassanian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,224,031
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Global Oncology
#129
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,742
of 363,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Oncology
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.