You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does cannabis legalisation change healthcare utilisation? A population-based study using the healthcare cost and utilisation project in Colorado, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca N Delling, Eric Vittinghoff, Thomas A Dewland, Mark J Pletcher, Jeffrey E Olgin, Gregory Nah, Kirstin Aschbacher, Christina D Fang, Emily S Lee, Shannon M Fan, Dhruv S Kazi, Gregory M Marcus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#286,509
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#476
of 25,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,831
of 366,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#16
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.