You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrice Sutton, Tracey J. Woodruff, Joanne Perron, Naomi Stotland, Jeanne A. Conry, Mark D. Miller, Linda C. Giudice |
| Abstract |
Every pregnant woman in the United States is exposed to many and varied environmental chemicals. Rapidly accumulating scientific evidence documents that widespread exposure to environmental chemicals at levels that are encountered in daily life can impact reproductive and developmental health adversely. Preconception and prenatal exposure to environmental chemicals are of particular importance because they may have a profound and lasting impact on health across the life course. Thus, prevention of developmental exposures to environmental chemicals would benefit greatly from the active participation of reproductive health professionals in clinical and policy arenas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,461,810
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#1,413
of 13,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,609
of 168,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.