You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Combined Pulmonary-Radiology Workshop for Visual Evaluation of COPD: Study Design, Chest CT Findings and Concordance with Quantitative Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3109/15412555.2012.654923 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
COPDGene CT Workshop Group: R. Graham Barr, Eugene A. Berkowitz, Francesca Bigazzi, Frederick Bode, Jessica Bon, Russell P. Bowler, Caroline Chiles, James D. Crapo, Gerard J. Criner, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Chandra Dass, Asger Dirksen, Mark T. Dransfield, Goutham Edula, Leif Erikkson, Adam Friedlander, Maya Galperin-Aizenberg, Warren B. Gefter, David S. Gierada, Philippe A. Grenier, Jonathan Goldin, MeiLan K. Han, Nicola A. Hanania, Nadia N. Hansel, Francine L. Jacobson, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Vuokko L. Kinnula, David A. Lipson, David A. Lynch, William MacNee, Barry J. Make, A. James Mamary, Howard Mann, Nathaniel Marchetti, Mario Mascalchi, Geoffrey McLennan, James R. Murphy, David Naidich, Hrudaya Nath, John D. Newell, Massimo Pistolesi, Elizabeth A. Regan, John J. Reilly, Robert Sandhaus, Joyce D. Schroeder, Frank Sciurba, Saher Shaker, Amir Sharafkhaneh, Edwin K. Silverman, Robert M. Steiner, Charlton Strange, Nicola Sverzellati, Joseph H. Tashjian, Edwin JR van Beek, Lacey Washington, George R. Washko, Gloria Westney, Susan A. Wood, Prescott G. Woodruff |
| Abstract |
The purposes of this study were: to describe chest CT findings in normal non-smoking controls and cigarette smokers with and without COPD; to compare the prevalence of CT abnormalities with severity of COPD; and to evaluate concordance between visual and quantitative chest CT (QCT) scoring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,313,103
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#450
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,406
of 171,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.