You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human motor cortical beta bursts relate to movement planning and response errors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Little, James Bonaiuto, Gareth Barnes, Sven Bestmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| France | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 59 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,810,830
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#2,795
of 9,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,022
of 364,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#65
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.