↓ Skip to main content

Biophysical characteristics of radiofrequency lesion formation in vivo: Dynamics of catheter tip–tissue contact evaluated by intracardiac echocardiography

Overview of attention for article published in American Heart Journal, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
15 patents

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biophysical characteristics of radiofrequency lesion formation in vivo: Dynamics of catheter tip–tissue contact evaluated by intracardiac echocardiography
Published in
American Heart Journal, January 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70242-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Kalman, Adam P. Fitzpatrick, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Michael C. Chin, Randall J. Lee, Melvin M. Scheinman, Michael D. Lesh, University of California From the Department of Medicine and the Cardiovascular Research Institute

Abstract

During clinical radiofrequency catheter ablation a wide range of delivered power may be necessary to achieve success despite an apparently stable catheter position on fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to use intracardiac echocardiography to characterize the relation between catheter tip-tissue contact and the efficiency of heating during applications of radiofrequency energy in vivo and to determine whether intracardiac echocardiography could be used prospectively to improve tissue contact. A closed-loop temperature feedback control system was used during radio-frequency applications at five anatomic regions in the right atrium of 15 anesthetized dogs to ensure achievement of a predetermined temperature (70 degrees C) at the catheter tip thermistor by automatic adjustment of delivered power (maximum 100 W). The efficiency-of-heating index was defined as the ratio of steady-state temperature (degrees Celsius) to power (watts). Two-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography was used to evaluate movement of the catheter tip relative to the endocardium. Perpendicular contact was scored as good, average, or poor and lateral catheter sliding as < 2, 2 to 5, or > 5 mm. Two groups of animals were included: group 1, in which tissue contact was guided by fluoroscopic and electrographic criteria for stability of contact, with intracardiac echocardiography used simply to observe the application; and group 2, in which tissue contact was guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Of 66 applications, 18 (27.3%) had poor perpendicular contact on echocardiography, and 12 (18.2%) demonstrated lateral sliding of > 5 mm even though they had been considered to have good tissue contact by fluoroscopic and electrographic criteria. Perpendicular catheter contact and anatomic location were shown to be independently related to the efficiency-of-heating index. Applications with good perpendicular contact had a significantly higher efficiency-of-heating index and a significantly greater lesion size than those with average or poor contact. The percentage of applications having good perpendicular tissue contact and the lesion size were significantly greater when tissue contact was guided by intracardiac echocardiography compared with fluoroscopic and electrographic guidance. This study demonstrates that variations in catheter tip-tissue contact account for differences in the efficiency of tissue heating, independently of the anatomic site of the application. Poor tissue contact was observed by intracardiac echocardiography and confirmed by indexes of tissue heating in approximately one third of radiofrequency applications despite a fluoroscopic appearance and electrographic morphologic appearance suggestive of good tissue contact. There was a significant correlation between echocardiographic evaluation of tissue contact, parameters of tissue heating (efficiency-of-heating index), and lesion size. In addition, intracardiac echocardiography could be used prospectively to improve the percentage of good contact applications and increase the lesion size.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Master 6 18%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Engineering 10 30%
Computer Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#1,436
of 5,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,464
of 92,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.