↓ Skip to main content

What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease?
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, July 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06650.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Little, Peter Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 255 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Other 14 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 49 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 17%
Engineering 45 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Psychology 10 4%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 69 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#3,945
of 12,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,618
of 181,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#28
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.