| Title |
Rationale and design of the TAILOR-PCI digital study: Transitioning a randomized controlled trial to a digital registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Heart Journal, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naveen L Pereira, Robert Avram, Derek Y So, Erin Iturriaga, Julia Byrne, Ryan J Lennon, Vishakantha Murthy, Nancy Geller, Shaun G Goodman, Charanjit Rihal, Yves Rosenberg, Kent Bailey, Mark J Pletcher, Gregory M Marcus, Michael E Farkouh, Jeffrey E Olgin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,192,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#2,311
of 5,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,533
of 440,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#50
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.