↓ Skip to main content

Streamlined ex vivo and in vivo genome editing in mouse embryos using recombinant adeno-associated viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
77 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Streamlined ex vivo and in vivo genome editing in mouse embryos using recombinant adeno-associated viruses
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02706-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeonsoo Yoon, Dan Wang, Phillip W. L. Tai, Joy Riley, Guangping Gao, Jaime A. Rivera-Pérez

Abstract

Recent advances using CRISPR-Cas9 approaches have dramatically enhanced the ease for genetic manipulation in rodents. Notwithstanding, the methods to deliver nucleic acids into pre-implantation embryos have hardly changed since the original description of mouse transgenesis more than 30 years ago. Here we report a novel strategy to generate genetically modified mice by transduction of CRISPR-Cas9 components into pre-implantation mouse embryos via recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs). Using this approach, we efficiently generated a variety of targeted mutations in explanted embryos, including indel events produced by non-homologous end joining and tailored mutations using homology-directed repair. We also achieved gene modification in vivo by direct delivery of rAAV particles into the oviduct of pregnant females. Our approach greatly simplifies the generation of genetically modified mice and, more importantly, opens the door for streamlined gene editing in other mammalian species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#712,317
of 24,770,025 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#12,141
of 53,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,213
of 452,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#343
of 1,176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,770,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.