You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Notch2 Receptor Signaling Controls Functional Differentiation of Dendritic Cells in the Spleen and Intestine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Immunity, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kanako L. Lewis, Michele L. Caton, Milena Bogunovic, Melanie Greter, Lucja T. Grajkowska, Dennis Ng, Apostolos Klinakis, Israel F. Charo, Steffen Jung, Jennifer L. Gommerman, Ivaylo I. Ivanov, Kang Liu, Miriam Merad, Boris Reizis |
| Abstract |
Dendritic cells (DCs) in tissues and lymphoid organs comprise distinct functional subsets that differentiate in situ from circulating progenitors. Tissue-specific signals that regulate DC subset differentiation are poorly understood. We report that DC-specific deletion of the Notch2 receptor caused a reduction of DC populations in the spleen. Within the splenic CD11b(+) DC subset, Notch signaling blockade ablated a distinct population marked by high expression of the adhesion molecule Esam. The Notch-dependent Esam(hi) DC subset required lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling, proliferated in situ, and facilitated CD4(+) T cell priming. The Notch-independent Esam(lo) DCs expressed monocyte-related genes and showed superior cytokine responses. In addition, Notch2 deletion led to the loss of CD11b(+)CD103(+) DCs in the intestinal lamina propria and to a corresponding decrease of IL-17-producing CD4(+) T cells in the intestine. Thus, Notch2 is a common differentiation signal for T cell-priming CD11b(+) DC subsets in the spleen and intestine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 353 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 29% |
| Researcher | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 101 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 68 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,807,943
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Immunity
#2,553
of 4,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,300
of 151,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.