↓ Skip to main content

Human Otopathologic Findings in Cases of Folded Cochlear Implant Electrodes

Overview of attention for article published in Otology & Neurotology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Otopathologic Findings in Cases of Folded Cochlear Implant Electrodes
Published in
Otology & Neurotology, September 2018
DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000001886
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle R Trakimas, Elliott D Kozin, Iman Ghanad, Joseph B Nadol, Aaron K Remenschneider

Abstract

We hypothesize that human cases of cochlear implantation (CI) with folding of the electrode array will demonstrate greater degrees of intracochlear ossification, lower spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) counts, and poorer audiometric outcomes. CI electrode array folding, such folding of the proximal array, is a relatively common surgical complication that can occur with forceful electrode insertion and may be an important and avoidable factor affecting implant outcomes. However, otopathologic findings and audiologic outcomes of human cases where folding of the implant electrode array is observed remain undefined. Specimens from a human temporal bone repository having undergone CI during life were evaluated. Specimens with folding of the electrode array on histological analysis constituted study cases. Electrode-matched specimens without array folding constituted controls. All specimens were examined by light microscopy and histopathologically described. Intracochlear fibrosis and osseous tissue, and SGN counts were measured. Pre- and postoperative word recognition scores were also compared. Cases with folded electrodes showed greater volumes of intracochlear osseous tissue than controls, which was most prominent in areas adjacent to array folding. Both cases and controls demonstrated similar amounts of fibrous tissue. Folded cases showed decreased SGNs when compared with the contralateral ear, whereas controls showed stable SGN populations between ears. In this small cohort, postoperative hearing outcomes were similar between groups. Atypical fibro-osseous changes and lower SGN counts are observed in cases of CI electrode folding. Future studies are necessary to determine if recognition and correction of folding can prevent long-term intracochlear changes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Engineering 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Otology & Neurotology
#3,169
of 3,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,408
of 335,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otology & Neurotology
#91
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.