↓ Skip to main content

One hypervirulent clone, sequence type 283, accounts for a large proportion of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from humans and diseased tilapia in Southeast Asia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One hypervirulent clone, sequence type 283, accounts for a large proportion of invasive Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from humans and diseased tilapia in Southeast Asia
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Barkham, Ruth N. Zadoks, Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai, Stephen Baker, Vu Thi Ngoc Bich, Victoria Chalker, Man Ling Chau, David Dance, Rama Narayana Deepak, H. Rogier van Doorn, Ramona A. Gutierrez, Mark A. Holmes, Lan Nguyen Phu Huong, Tse Hsien Koh, Elisabete Martins, Kurosh Mehershahi, Paul Newton, Lee Ching Ng, Nguyen Ngoc Phuoc, Ornuma Sangwichian, Pongpun Sawatwong, Uraiwan Surin, Thean Yen Tan, Wen Ying Tang, Nguyen Vu Thuy, Paul Turner, Manivanh Vongsouvath, Defeng Zhang, Toni Whistler, Swaine L. Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 62 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 5%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 66 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#965,663
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#528
of 9,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,734
of 367,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#8
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.