You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suspected neonatal isoerythrolysis with concurrent Actinomyces hyovaginalis in a foal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5455/javar.2018.e259 |
| Authors |
Eric Chung, Lawan Adamu, Faez Jesse, Ya Wakil, Esther Solomon, Usman Turaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research
#6
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,702
of 442,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them