↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Feeling Blue or Turquoise? Emotional Differentiation in Major Depressive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
45 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
46 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Feeling Blue or Turquoise? Emotional Differentiation in Major Depressive Disorder
Published in
Psychological Science, October 2012
DOI 10.1177/0956797612444903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emre Demiralp, Renee J. Thompson, Jutta Mata, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Metin Demiralp, Luis Hernandez-Garcia, Patricia J. Deldin, Ian H. Gotlib, John Jonides

Abstract

Some individuals have very specific and differentiated emotional experiences, such as anger, shame, excitement, and happiness, whereas others have more general affective experiences of pleasure or discomfort that are not as highly differentiated. Considering that individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) have cognitive deficits for negative information, we predicted that people with MDD would have less differentiated negative emotional experiences than would healthy people. To test this hypothesis, we assessed participants' emotional experiences using a 7-day experience-sampling protocol. Depression was assessed using structured clinical interviews and the Beck Depression Inventory-II. As predicted, individuals with MDD had less differentiated emotional experiences than did healthy participants, but only for negative emotions. These differences were above and beyond the effects of emotional intensity and variability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 4%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 255 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 22%
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 37 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 163 60%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 418. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#71,036
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#180
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297
of 193,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.