| Title |
Population-based estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) prevalence and characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciab408 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana L Hirschtick, Andrea R Titus, Elizabeth Slocum, Laura E Power, Robert E Hirschtick, Michael R Elliott, Patricia McKane, Nancy L Fleischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 77 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 85% |
| Scientists | 12 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#177,652
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#412
of 16,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,212
of 459,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#21
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.