Title |
Charting human development using a multi-endodermal organ atlas and organoid models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.028 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qianhui Yu, Umut Kilik, Emily M. Holloway, Yu-Hwai Tsai, Christoph Harmel, Angeline Wu, Joshua H. Wu, Michael Czerwinski, Charlie J. Childs, Zhisong He, Meghan M. Capeling, Sha Huang, Ian A. Glass, Peter D.R. Higgins, Barbara Treutlein, Jason R. Spence, J. Gray Camp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 55 | 26% |
France | 12 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 5% |
Switzerland | 10 | 5% |
Germany | 9 | 4% |
Canada | 7 | 3% |
Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
Italy | 3 | 1% |
Austria | 3 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Unknown | 76 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 101 | 49% |
Scientists | 99 | 48% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 21% |
Researcher | 34 | 16% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 65 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 18 | 9% |
Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#333,856
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,812
of 17,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,504
of 460,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#64
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.