| Title |
Prevalence of Clinical and Subclinical Myocarditis in Competitive Athletes With Recent SARS-CoV-2 Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Cardiology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Curt J. Daniels, Saurabh Rajpal, Joel T. Greenshields, Geoffrey L. Rosenthal, Eugene H. Chung, Michael Terrin, Jean Jeudy, Scott E. Mattson, Ian H. Law, James Borchers, Richard Kovacs, Jeffrey Kovan, Sami F. Rifat, Jennifer Albrecht, Ana I. Bento, Lonnie Albers, David Bernhardt, Carly Day, Suzanne Hecht, Andrew Hipskind, Jeffrey Mjaanes, David Olson, Yvette L. Rooks, Emily C. Somers, Matthew S. Tong, Jeffrey Wisinski, Jason Womack, Carrie Esopenko, Christopher J. Kratochvil, Lawrence D. Rink, Orlando Simonetti, Karolina Zareba, Salman Bhatti, Daniel Addison, Timothy Obarski, Emile Daoud, Matthew Granger, Suzanne Smart, Jessica Mayercin-Johnson, Preethi Subramanian, Jeffery Glitt, Deborah Mitchell, Rose Chumita, Amy Mumford, Anne Garcia, Lori Garris, Hongjie Liu, Bradley Hatfield, Yuji Zhang, Douglas Boersma, Zachary Schlader, Shawn Goodwin, Nicholas Port, Taylor Zuidema, Jennifer Maldonado, Lee Eckhardt, Scott Reeder, Mathue Baker, Wayne Sebastianelli, Rebecca Wadlinger, Roberta Millard, Philip Bosha, Haley Sunday, Danae Steele, Anisa Chaudhry, Soraya Smith, Micheal Pfeiffer, John Kellerman, Gregory Billy, Jason Krystofiak, Micah Eimer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,009 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 586 | 15% |
| Japan | 252 | 6% |
| Canada | 130 | 3% |
| France | 118 | 3% |
| Turkey | 83 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 80 | 2% |
| Australia | 45 | 1% |
| Germany | 42 | 1% |
| Italy | 31 | <1% |
| Other | 346 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2296 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3492 | 87% |
| Scientists | 255 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 195 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 59 | 1% |
| Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 21% |
| Unknown | 94 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 101 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4068. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,192
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Cardiology
#3
of 2,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 436,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Cardiology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.