| Title |
The rise of affectivism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Dukes, Kathryn Abrams, Ralph Adolphs, Mohammed E. Ahmed, Andrew Beatty, Kent C. Berridge, Susan Broomhall, Tobias Brosch, Joseph J. Campos, Zanna Clay, Fabrice Clément, William A. Cunningham, Antonio Damasio, Hanna Damasio, Justin D’Arms, Jane W. Davidson, Beatrice de Gelder, Julien Deonna, Ronnie de Sousa, Paul Ekman, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Ernst Fehr, Agneta Fischer, Ad Foolen, Ute Frevert, Didier Grandjean, Jonathan Gratch, Leslie Greenberg, Patricia Greenspan, James J. Gross, Eran Halperin, Arvid Kappas, Dacher Keltner, Brian Knutson, David Konstan, Mariska E. Kret, Joseph E. LeDoux, Jennifer S. Lerner, Robert W. Levenson, George Loewenstein, Antony S. R. Manstead, Terry A. Maroney, Agnes Moors, Paula Niedenthal, Brian Parkinson, Ioannis Pavlidis, Catherine Pelachaud, Seth D. Pollak, Gilles Pourtois, Birgitt Roettger-Roessler, James A. Russell, Disa Sauter, Andrea Scarantino, Klaus R. Scherer, Peter Stearns, Jan E. Stets, Christine Tappolet, Fabrice Teroni, Jeanne Tsai, Jonathan Turner, Carien Van Reekum, Patrik Vuilleumier, Tim Wharton, David Sander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 225 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 12% |
| Canada | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 50% |
| Scientists | 97 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 19% |
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 77 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 76 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#205,195
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#348
of 1,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,986
of 458,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#19
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 158.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.