| Title |
Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2017.74.0472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Krop, Nofisat Ismaila, Fabrice Andre, Robert C Bast, William Barlow, Deborah E Collyar, M Elizabeth Hammond, Nicole M Kuderer, Minetta C Liu, Robert G Mennel, Catherine Van Poznak, Antonio C Wolff, Vered Stearns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 24% |
| Brazil | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Mexico | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 317 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 70 | 22% |
| Unknown | 77 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 93 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 499. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#51,856
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#84
of 22,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,064
of 325,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.