↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Association of Hospital-Level Volume of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cases and Mortality. Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
566 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Association of Hospital-Level Volume of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cases and Mortality. Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201409-1634oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan P. Barbaro, Folafoluwa O. Odetola, Kelley M. Kidwell, Matthew L. Paden, Robert H. Bartlett, Matthew M. Davis, Gail M. Annich

Abstract

Rationale: Recent pediatric studies suggest a survival benefit exists for higher volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers. Objective: To determine if higher annual ECMO patient volume is associated with lower case-mix-adjusted hospital mortality rate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed an international registry of ECMO support from 1989-2013. Patients were separated into three age groups: neonatal (0-28 days), pediatric (29 days to <18 years), and adult (≥18 years). The measure of hospital ECMO volume was age group specific and adjusted for patient-level case-mix and hospital-level variance using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression modeling. The primary outcome was death prior to hospital discharge. A subgroup analysis was conducted for 2008-2013. Measurements and Main Results: From 1989-2013, 290 centers provided ECMO support to 56,222 patients (30,909 neonates; 14,725 children; 10,588 adults). Annual ECMO mortality rates varied widely across ECMO centers: the interquartile range was 18-50% for neonates, 25-66% for pediatrics, and 33-92% for adults. For 1989-2013, higher age group specific ECMO volume was associated with lower odds of ECMO mortality for neonates and adults, but not for pediatric cases. In 2008-2013, the volume-outcome association remained statistically significant only among adults. Patients receiving ECMO at hospitals with >30 adult annual ECMO cases had significantly lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio=0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.80) compared with adults receiving ECMO at hospitals with <6 annual cases. Conclusions: In this international, case-mix-adjusted analysis, higher annual hospital ECMO volume was associated with lower mortality in 1989-2013 for neonates and adults; the association among adults persisted in 2008-2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 17%
Other 28 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 60 25%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#521,031
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#385
of 12,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,916
of 280,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#6
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.