↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
patent
24 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
Title
Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published in
JACC, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vallerie V. McLaughlin, Sanjiv J. Shah, Rogerio Souza, Marc Humbert

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common and may result from a number of disorders, including left heart disease, lung disease, and chronic thromboembolic disease. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an uncommon disease characterized by progressive remodeling of the distal pulmonary arteries, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and, eventually, in right ventricular failure. Over the past decades, knowledge of the basic pathobiology of PAH and its natural history, prognostic indicators, and therapeutic options has exploded. A thorough evaluation of a patient is critical to correctly characterize the PH. Cardiac studies, including echocardiography and right heart catheterization, are key elements in the assessment. Given the multitude of treatment options currently available for PAH, assessment of risk and response to therapy is critical in long-term management. This review also underscores unique situations, including perioperative management, intensive care unit management, and pregnancy, and highlights the importance of collaborative care of the PAH patient through a multidisciplinary approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 501 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 60 12%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Student > Postgraduate 48 9%
Other 121 24%
Unknown 116 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 239 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Other 47 9%
Unknown 134 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,003,069
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,488
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,136
of 279,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#10
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.