| Title |
Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30951-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David E Kandzari, Michael Böhm, Felix Mahfoud, Raymond R Townsend, Michael A Weber, Stuart Pocock, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Dimitrios Tousoulis, James W Choi, Cara East, Sandeep Brar, Sidney A Cohen, Martin Fahy, Garrett Pilcher, Kazuomi Kario, SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Trial Investigators, Jiro Aoki, Bryan Batson, Michael Böhm, James W. Choi, Debbie L. Cohen, George Dangas, Shukri David, Justin Davies, Chandan M. Devireddy, David Kandzari, Kazuomi Kario, David P. Lee, Philipp C. Lurz, Vasilios Papademetriou, Manesh Patel, Kiritkumar Patel, Roland E. Schmieder, Andrew S.P. Sharp, Jasvindar Singh, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Antony Walton, Thomas Weber, Joachim Weil, Thomas Zeller, Khaled Ziada, Kengo Tanabe, Robert Wilkins, Felix Mahfoud, Cara East, Robert Wilensky, Johanna Contreras, Susan Steigerwalt, Neil Chapman, Janice P. Lea, Denise Reedus, Satoshi Hoshide, Adrian Ma, Karl Fengler, Ping Li, Laura Svetkey, Anjani Rao, Axel Schmid, Anthony F Watkinson, Angela Brown, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Ingrid Hopper, Markus Suppan, Tolga Agdirlioglu, Elias Noory, Craig Chasen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 20% |
| Mexico | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 20% |
| Scientists | 15 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 323 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 22% |
| Unknown | 107 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 580. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#41,176
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#812
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#885
of 345,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#14
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.