| Title |
An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0273-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel L. Rabosky, Jonathan Chang, Pascal O. Title, Peter F. Cowman, Lauren Sallan, Matt Friedman, Kristin Kaschner, Cristina Garilao, Thomas J. Near, Marta Coll, Michael E. Alfaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 801 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 174 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 60 | 7% |
| Spain | 37 | 5% |
| Canada | 35 | 4% |
| Germany | 25 | 3% |
| Australia | 25 | 3% |
| Japan | 15 | 2% |
| Norway | 12 | 1% |
| France | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 136 | 17% |
| Unknown | 270 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 421 | 53% |
| Scientists | 358 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 851 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 851 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 156 | 18% |
| Researcher | 123 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 105 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 14% |
| Unknown | 168 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 348 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 127 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 5% |
| Unknown | 206 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 601. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#38,817
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,372
of 98,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#778
of 342,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#68
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.