↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Abnormal RNA stability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Abnormal RNA stability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05049-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. M. Tank, C. Figueroa-Romero, L. M. Hinder, K. Bedi, H. C. Archbold, X. Li, K. Weskamp, N. Safren, X. Paez-Colasante, C. Pacut, S. Thumma, M. T. Paulsen, K. Guo, J. Hur, M. Ljungman, E. L. Feldman, S. J. Barmada

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) share key features, including accumulation of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43. TDP-43 regulates RNA homeostasis, but it remains unclear whether RNA stability is affected in these disorders. We use Bru-seq and BruChase-seq to assess genome-wide RNA stability in ALS patient-derived cells, demonstrating profound destabilization of ribosomal and mitochondrial transcripts. This pattern is recapitulated by TDP-43 overexpression, suggesting a primary role for TDP-43 in RNA destabilization, and in postmortem samples from ALS and FTD patients. Proteomics and functional studies illustrate corresponding reductions in mitochondrial components and compensatory increases in protein synthesis. Collectively, these observations suggest that TDP-43 deposition leads to targeted RNA instability in ALS and FTD, and may ultimately cause cell death by disrupting energy production and protein synthesis pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 28%
Neuroscience 34 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 50 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,597,715
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,227
of 47,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,442
of 328,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#613
of 1,323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.