↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Understanding the Association Between Frailty and Cardiac Surgical Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the Association Between Frailty and Cardiac Surgical Outcomes
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Curtis S. Bergquist, Elizabeth A. Jackson, Michael P. Thompson, Lourdes Cabrera, Gaetano Paone, Alphonse DeLucia, Chang He, Richard L. Prager, Donald S. Likosky, Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative

Abstract

Prior work identified a direct relationship between frailty and adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery, but assessment of the effect across patient subgroups has largely been ignored. We identified whether frailty's (measured by gait speed) association with adverse outcomes differed across patient subgroups. We evaluated 53,932 patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2011 and 2016 across 33 Michigan institutions. Five-meter gait speed (in seconds) was divided into groups: faster (<5.0), intermediate (5.0-5.99); slower (>=6.0). We used mixed logistic regression to estimate the relationship between increasing gait speed time and a patient's odds of major morbidity or mortality, adjusting for patient demographics, disease characteristics, surgeon and hospital. Effect modification by patient subgroup and gait speed test time was tested with interaction terms. Our secondary end point was an analysis of discharge disposition. Nearly one quarter (22.7%) of patients had at least one gait speed test. Slower (34% of patients) vs. faster (28%) patients were older (72.5yrs vs. 62.6yrs), had more comorbidities and developed our primary outcome (16.6% vs. 9.5%), p<0.0001. Significant interactions with gait speed existed for patient comorbidities (chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, p<0.05), though marginal interactions existed for patient age (p=0.059) and diabetes (p = 0.063). Slower patients were more often discharged to a facility rather than home. Slower gait speed was associated with increased odds of major morbidity or mortality. This effect was amplified among patients with pre-existing comorbidities. Future studies should evaluate the impact of pre-procedural interventions on frailty, including those aimed at addressing comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 19%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,109,909
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#614
of 8,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,383
of 340,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#11
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.