| Title |
Effect of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor on Retinal Neurodegeneration in Patients with Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ophthalmology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Y. Chew, Traci E. Clemons, Glenn J. Jaffe, Charles A. Johnson, Sina Farsiu, Eleonora M. Lad, Robyn Guymer, Philip Rosenfeld, Jean-Pierre Hubschman, Ian Constable, Henry Wiley, Lawrence J. Singerman, Mark Gillies, Grant Comer, Barbara Blodi, Dean Eliott, Jiong Yan, Alan Bird, Martin Friedlander, Macular Telangiectasia Type 2-Phase 2 CNTF Research Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#293,601
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#101
of 6,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,150
of 359,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#2
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.