| Title |
Using the 6-minute walk test to predict disability-free survival after major surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.A. Shulman, B.H. Cuthbertson, D.N. Wijeysundera, R.M. Pearse, B. Thompson, E. Torres, A. Ambosta, S. Wallace, C. Farrington, P.S. Myles, the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance for Surgery Study Investigators, S. Wallace, B. Thompson, M. Ellis, B. Borg, R.K. Kerridge, J. Douglas, J. Brannan, J. Pretto, M.G. Godsall, N. Beauchamp, S. Allen, A. Kennedy, E. Wright, J. Malherbe, H. Ismail, B. Riedel, A. Melville, H. Sivakumar, A. Murmane, K. Kenchington, U. Gurunathan, C. Stonell, K. Brunello, K. Steele, O. Tronstad, P. Masel, A. Dent, E. Smith, A. Bodger, M. Abolfathi, P. Sivalingam, A. Hall, T. Painter, S. Macklin, A. Elliott, A.M. Carrera, N.C.S. Terblanche, S. Pitt, J. Samuels, C. Wilde, A. MacCormick, K. Leslie, D. Bramley, A.M. Southcott, J. Grant, H. Taylor, S. Bates, M. Towns, A. Tippett, F. Marshall, C.J.L. McCartney, S. Choi, P. Somascanthan, K. Flores, W.S. Beattie, K. Karkouti, H.A. Clarke, A. Jerath, S.A. McCluskey, M. Wasowicz, J.T. Granton, L. Day, J. Pazmino-Canizares, K. Hagen, D. Campbell, T. Short, J. Van Der Westhuizen, K. Higgie, H. Lindsay, R. Jang, C. Wong, D. Mcallister, M. Ali, J. Kumar, E. Waymouth, C. Kim, J. Dimech, M. Lorimer, J. Tai, R. Miller, R. Sara, A. Collingwood, S. Olliff, S. Gabriel, H. Houston, P. Dalley, S. Hurford, A. Hunt, L. Andrews, L. Navarra, A. Jason-Smith, H. Thompson, N. McMillan, G. Back, M. Melo, M. Mamdani, G. Hillis, H.C. Wijeysundera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 24% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,001,754
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#260
of 6,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,488
of 357,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#6
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.