| Title |
Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization Links Cell Lines with Aggressive Head and Neck Cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Cheng, Xinping Yang, Han Si, Anthony D. Saleh, Wenming Xiao, Jamie Coupar, Susanne M. Gollin, Robert L. Ferris, Natalia Issaeva, Wendell G. Yarbrough, Mark E. Prince, Thomas E. Carey, Carter Van Waes, Zhong Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 35% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 12 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,829,323
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#5,964
of 12,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,036
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#161
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.