| Title |
Aspirin Use and Respiratory Morbidity in COPD A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2018.11.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashraf Fawzy, Nirupama Putcha, Carrie P. Aaron, Russell P. Bowler, Alejandro P. Comellas, Christopher B. Cooper, Mark T. Dransfield, MeiLan K. Han, Eric A. Hoffman, Richard E. Kanner, Jerry A. Krishnan, Wassim W. Labaki, Robert Paine, Laura M. Paulin, Stephen P. Peters, Robert Wise, R. Graham Barr, Nadia N. Hansel, SPIROMICS Investigators, Neil E. Alexis, Wayne H. Anderson, Igor Barjaktarevic, R. Graham Barr, Eugene R. Bleecker, Richard C. Boucher, Russell P. Bowler, Elizabeth E. Carretta, Stephanie A. Christenson, Alejandro P. Comellas, Christopher B. Cooper, David J. Couper, Gerard J. Criner, Ronald G. Crystal, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Claire M. Doerschuk, Mark T. Dransfield, Christine M. Freeman, MeiLan K. Han, Nadia N. Hansel, Annette T. Hastie, Eric A. Hoffman, Robert J. Kaner, Richard E. Kanner, Eric C. Kleerup, Jerry A. Krishnan, Lisa M. LaVange, Stephen C. Lazarus, Fernando J. Martinez, Deborah A. Meyers, Wendy C. Moore, John D. Newell, Laura Paulin, Stephen Peters, Cheryl Pirozzi, Elizabeth C. Oelsner, Wanda K. O’Neal, Victor E. Ortega, Robert Paine, Nirupama Putcha, Sanjeev Raman, Stephen I. Rennard, Donald P. Tashkin, J. Michael Wells, Robert A. Wise, Prescott G. Woodruff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 25% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 13% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#416,069
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#249
of 13,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,263
of 444,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#4
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.