| Title |
Dual-Physician Households
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.4413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren Ferrante, Lona Mody |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 130 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 132 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 24% |
| Scientists | 57 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 38% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2020.
All research outputs
#227,765
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,057
of 36,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,488
of 369,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#78
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.