| Title |
Non-oncogene Addiction to SIRT3 Plays a Critical Role in Lymphomagenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meng Li, Ying-Ling Chiang, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Matthew R. Teater, Jun Young Hong, Hao Shen, Ling Wang, Jing Hu, Hui Jing, Zhengming Chen, Neeraj Jain, Cihangir Duy, Sucharita J. Mistry, Leandro Cerchietti, Justin R. Cross, Lewis C. Cantley, Michael R. Green, Hening Lin, Ari M. Melnick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 48% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,082,601
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#1,661
of 3,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,295
of 363,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.