| Title |
Rapid metabolic shifts occur during the transition between hunger and satiety in Drosophila melanogaster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11933-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Wilinski, Jasmine Winzeler, William Duren, Jenna L. Persons, Kristina J. Holme, Johan Mosquera, Morteza Khabiri, Jason M. Kinchen, Peter L. Freddolino, Alla Karnovsky, Monica Dus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 51% |
| Scientists | 30 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#357,606
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#5,582
of 58,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,232
of 351,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#118
of 1,450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.