↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high‐, middle‐ and low‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 6,061)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
372 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
549 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high‐, middle‐ and low‐income countries
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/bjs.10151
Pubmed ID
Authors

GlobalSurg Collaborative

Abstract

Surgical mortality data are collected routinely in high-income countries, yet virtually no low- or middle-income countries have outcome surveillance in place. The aim was prospectively to collect worldwide mortality data following emergency abdominal surgery, comparing findings across countries with a low, middle or high Human Development Index (HDI). This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Self-selected hospitals performing emergency surgery submitted prespecified data for consecutive patients from at least one 2-week interval during July to December 2014. Postoperative mortality was analysed by hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Data were obtained for 10 745 patients from 357 centres in 58 countries; 6538 were from high-, 2889 from middle- and 1318 from low-HDI settings. The overall mortality rate was 1·6 per cent at 24 h (high 1·1 per cent, middle 1·9 per cent, low 3·4 per cent; P < 0·001), increasing to 5·4 per cent by 30 days (high 4·5 per cent, middle 6·0 per cent, low 8·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Of the 578 patients who died, 404 (69·9 per cent) did so between 24 h and 30 days following surgery (high 74·2 per cent, middle 68·8 per cent, low 60·5 per cent). After adjustment, 30-day mortality remained higher in middle-income (odds ratio (OR) 2·78, 95 per cent c.i. 1·84 to 4·20) and low-income (OR 2·97, 1·84 to 4·81) countries. Surgical safety checklist use was less frequent in low- and middle-income countries, but when used was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days. Mortality is three times higher in low- compared with high-HDI countries even when adjusted for prognostic factors. Patient safety factors may have an important role. Registration number: NCT02179112 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 372 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 5 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 539 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 12%
Other 59 11%
Researcher 51 9%
Student > Master 48 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 8%
Other 155 28%
Unknown 122 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 315 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 3%
Engineering 10 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Other 30 5%
Unknown 164 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 353. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#92,839
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#13
of 6,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,795
of 313,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.