↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
371 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.6183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reshma Jagsi, Kent A. Griffith, Abigail Stewart, Dana Sambuco, Rochelle DeCastro, Peter A. Ubel

Abstract

It is unclear whether male and female physician researchers who perform similar work are currently paid equally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 371 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 210 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Other 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 55 25%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 37%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Psychology 14 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 64 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#57,806
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,118
of 36,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202
of 181,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.