| Title |
A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David E. Gordon, Gwendolyn M. Jang, Mehdi Bouhaddou, Jiewei Xu, Kirsten Obernier, Kris M. White, Matthew J. O’Meara, Veronica V. Rezelj, Jeffrey Z. Guo, Danielle L. Swaney, Tia A. Tummino, Ruth Hüttenhain, Robyn M. Kaake, Alicia L. Richards, Beril Tutuncuoglu, Helene Foussard, Jyoti Batra, Kelsey Haas, Maya Modak, Minkyu Kim, Paige Haas, Benjamin J. Polacco, Hannes Braberg, Jacqueline M. Fabius, Manon Eckhardt, Margaret Soucheray, Melanie J. Bennett, Merve Cakir, Michael J. McGregor, Qiongyu Li, Bjoern Meyer, Ferdinand Roesch, Thomas Vallet, Alice Mac Kain, Lisa Miorin, Elena Moreno, Zun Zar Chi Naing, Yuan Zhou, Shiming Peng, Ying Shi, Ziyang Zhang, Wenqi Shen, Ilsa T. Kirby, James E. Melnyk, John S. Chorba, Kevin Lou, Shizhong A. Dai, Inigo Barrio-Hernandez, Danish Memon, Claudia Hernandez-Armenta, Jiankun Lyu, Christopher J. P. Mathy, Tina Perica, Kala Bharath Pilla, Sai J. Ganesan, Daniel J. Saltzberg, Ramachandran Rakesh, Xi Liu, Sara B. Rosenthal, Lorenzo Calviello, Srivats Venkataramanan, Jose Liboy-Lugo, Yizhu Lin, Xi-Ping Huang, YongFeng Liu, Stephanie A. Wankowicz, Markus Bohn, Maliheh Safari, Fatima S. Ugur, Cassandra Koh, Nastaran Sadat Savar, Quang Dinh Tran, Djoshkun Shengjuler, Sabrina J. Fletcher, Michael C. O’Neal, Yiming Cai, Jason C. J. Chang, David J. Broadhurst, Saker Klippsten, Phillip P. Sharp, Nicole A. Wenzell, Duygu Kuzuoglu-Ozturk, Hao-Yuan Wang, Raphael Trenker, Janet M. Young, Devin A. Cavero, Joseph Hiatt, Theodore L. Roth, Ujjwal Rathore, Advait Subramanian, Julia Noack, Mathieu Hubert, Robert M. Stroud, Alan D. Frankel, Oren S. Rosenberg, Kliment A. Verba, David A. Agard, Melanie Ott, Michael Emerman, Natalia Jura, Mark von Zastrow, Eric Verdin, Alan Ashworth, Olivier Schwartz, Christophe d’Enfert, Shaeri Mukherjee, Matt Jacobson, Harmit S. Malik, Danica G. Fujimori, Trey Ideker, Charles S. Craik, Stephen N. Floor, James S. Fraser, John D. Gross, Andrej Sali, Bryan L. Roth, Davide Ruggero, Jack Taunton, Tanja Kortemme, Pedro Beltrao, Marco Vignuzzi, Adolfo García-Sastre, Kevan M. Shokat, Brian K. Shoichet, Nevan J. Krogan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,614 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 629 | 24% |
| France | 98 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 91 | 3% |
| Spain | 74 | 3% |
| Japan | 46 | 2% |
| Canada | 43 | 2% |
| India | 37 | 1% |
| Germany | 32 | 1% |
| Mexico | 22 | <1% |
| Other | 254 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1288 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2067 | 79% |
| Scientists | 428 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 81 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 37 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,896 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3896 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 566 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 534 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 425 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 361 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 145 | 4% |
| Other | 632 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1233 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 919 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 290 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 290 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 210 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 197 | 5% |
| Other | 593 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1397 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3469. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,672
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#165
of 98,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160
of 410,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#14
of 937 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 937 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.