↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Confronting Racism in Chemistry Journals

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
212 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Confronting Racism in Chemistry Journals
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, June 2020
DOI 10.1021/acsami.0c10979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia J Burrows, Jiaxing Huang, Shu Wang, Hyun Jae Kim, Gerald J Meyer, Kirk Schanze, T Randall Lee, Jodie L Lutkenhaus, David Kaplan, Christopher Jones, Carolyn Bertozzi, Laura Kiessling, Mary Beth Mulcahy, Craig W Lindsley, M G Finn, Joel D Blum, Prashant Kamat, Wonyong Choi, Shane Snyder, Courtney C Aldrich, Stuart Rowan, Bin Liu, Dennis Liotta, Paul S Weiss, Deqing Zhang, Krishna N Ganesh, Harry A Atwater, J Justin Gooding, David T Allen, Christopher A Voigt, Jonathan Sweedler, Alanna Schepartz, Vincent Rotello, Sébastien Lecommandoux, Shana J Sturla, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer, Jillian Buriak, Jonathan W Steed, Hongwei Wu, Julie Zimmerman, Bryan Brooks, Phillip Savage, William Tolman, Thomas F Hofmann, Joan F Brennecke, Thomas A Holme, Kenneth M Merz, Gustavo Scuseria, William Jorgensen, Gunda I Georg, Shaomeng Wang, Philip Proteau, John R Yates, Peter Stang, Gilbert C Walker, Marc Hillmyer, Lynne S Taylor, Teri W Odom, Erick Carreira, Kai Rossen, Paul Chirik, Scott J Miller, Joan-Emma Shea, Anne McCoy, Martin Zanni, Gregory Hartland, Gregory Scholes, Joseph A Loo, James Milne, Sarah B Tegen, Daniel T Kulp, Julia Laskin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 212 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#271,543
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#93
of 20,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,846
of 435,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#3
of 694 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 694 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.