| Title |
Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrine Bach Habersaat, Cornelia Betsch, Margie Danchin, Cass R. Sunstein, Robert Böhm, Armin Falk, Noel T. Brewer, Saad B. Omer, Martha Scherzer, Sunita Sah, Edward F. Fischer, Andrea E. Scheel, Daisy Fancourt, Shinobu Kitayama, Eve Dubé, Julie Leask, Mohan Dutta, Noni E. MacDonald, Anna Temkina, Andreas Lieberoth, Mark Jackson, Stephan Lewandowsky, Holly Seale, Nils Fietje, Philipp Schmid, Michele Gelfand, Lars Korn, Sarah Eitze, Lisa Felgendreff, Philipp Sprengholz, Cristiana Salvi, Robb Butler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 8% |
| Australia | 12 | 5% |
| Germany | 11 | 5% |
| Denmark | 10 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Austria | 4 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 90 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 132 | 58% |
| Scientists | 77 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 625 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 11% |
| Researcher | 65 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 116 | 19% |
| Unknown | 219 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 70 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 123 | 20% |
| Unknown | 250 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#178,802
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#314
of 1,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,985
of 436,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 158.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.