| Title |
Zika virus infection enhances future risk of severe dengue disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abb6143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah C Katzelnick, César Narvaez, Sonia Arguello, Brenda Lopez Mercado, Damaris Collado, Oscarlett Ampie, Douglas Elizondo, Tatiana Miranda, Fausto Bustos Carillo, Juan Carlos Mercado, Krista Latta, Amy Schiller, Bruno Segovia-Chumbez, Sergio Ojeda, Nery Sanchez, Miguel Plazaola, Josefina Coloma, M Elizabeth Halloran, Lakshmanane Premkumar, Aubree Gordon, Federico Narvaez, Aravinda M de Silva, Guillermina Kuan, Angel Balmaseda, Eva Harris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 464 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 7% |
| Colombia | 13 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| India | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 86 | 19% |
| Unknown | 195 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 295 | 64% |
| Scientists | 122 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 80 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 45 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 85 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#65,536
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,420
of 83,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,252
of 426,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#94
of 1,003 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,003 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.