| Title |
The importance of airway and lung microbiome in the critically ill
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03219-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Robert Dickson, Antoni Torres, Håkan Hanberger, Jeffrey Lipman, Massimo Antonelli, Gennaro de Pascale, Fernando Bozza, Jean Louis Vincent, Srinivas Murthy, Michael Bauer, John Marshall, Catia Cilloniz, Lieuwe D. Bos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,787,373
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,588
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,435
of 424,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#46
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.